We find ourselves at a crossroads: The Mark Lewisohn Disaster

The only way to preserve Beatles history—but more importantly, the only way to uncover that history in the first place—is to make it accessible. Universal. Free. The more it is shared, the more it is preserved. That is the only thing that ensures its survival. Knowledge monopolized is knowledge doomed to perish.

A TENDENCY TO FABRICATE HISTORY

The reason all historical associations put so much emphasis on historians being transparent is that they fully comprehend the power of the inherent trust—“the implicit assumption of honesty”—that we are forced to place in a historian. We have to trust that a relator of history is representing sources honestly and transparently because if readers cannot take that on faith historians cease to have value. The discipline of relating history collapses if we cannot trust The Historian.

DELUSIONAL LEWISOHN

The confidence with which Lewisohn recounts a series of events that only shows beyond all doubt that “the extraordinary story” he’s about to convey was not “unearthed,” but concocted—or dreamed—while clearly expecting the listener to see how it fits together and proves his narrative seems inexplicable to me by anything but delusion. Or if there is a rational explanation, it lies beyond my earthbound grasp.

John in the Star Club Tapes: No Mr. Lewisohn, he is not charming

“John— we need to talk about John Lennon on this recording. These recordings. Because he’s uh— he’s- he’s- he’s belligerent. Um, he’s under the influence of— I’m sure he’s under the influence of Prellies. Probably drink, as well. Um, he’s beguiling, he’s rude. He’s still charming. He’s— I mean he’s not horrible. He’s just —yeah— he’s just edgy!” -Mark Lewisohn